Cases 21 - 30 of 15,478
Martin v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Rodsdricke Martin
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Texas Health Resources, Leslie McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salganik et al v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 6:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Kallan Salganik and $3,006.30 IN US CURRENCY, ET AL
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, City of Waco, Chief Sheryl D. Victorian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Esteban-Bravo v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Tirso Esteban-Bravo
Defendant:
Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Turner v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2024cv01951
Plaintiff:
Devon Turner
Defendant:
City of Houston, Andrew Winterbottom and Chief Troy Finner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prosper v. City of Houston
as 24-20225
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Prosper
Defendant:
City of Houston, S.T. Keene, Officer and K.R. Haverstrom, Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-30322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lim v. NY State Board
as 24-10447
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Lim v. Eckert et al
as 4:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Susan Lynn Eckert, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lim v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
