Cases 21 - 30 of 626
Johnson v. Dozier
as 23-20293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Earnest Key Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Kelly Dozier and Brazos County Jail
Ross v. USA
as 4:2023cv00641
Petitioner:
Earnest Lynn Ross
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Kin Interinsurance Network v. Patterson, et al
as 2:2023cv02321
Plaintiff:
KIN Interinsurance Network
Defendant:
Earnest Patterson, McClenny, Moseley & Associates, PLLC and McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Rogers v. Mortgage Solutions of Colorado LLC d/b/a Mortgage Solutions FInancial
as 4:2023cv02424
Plaintiff:
Earnest Rogers
Defendant:
Mortgage Solutions of Colorado LLC d/b/a Mortgage Solutions FInancial and Mortgage Solutions of Colorado, LLC doing business as Mortgage Solutions Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McDavid v. Gonzalez
as 23-10427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy Lynn McDavid
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Gonzalez, Head Warden, Michael Miller, Assistant Warden, David S. Dyer, High Security and others
Johnson v. Dicky
as 4:2023cv01948
Petitioner:
Earnest K. Johnson
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Imani et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00439
Defendant:
Melvin Lee Holden, City of Baton Rouge, Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Plaintiff:
Blair Imani, Akeem Muhammad, Raae Pollard and others
Interested Party:
James W Craig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Utley v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03931
Petitioner:
Earnest Utley
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover v. Sharee et al
as 6:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Glover, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Sharee, Warden Unknown Ragsdale, Warden Unknown Steigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
