Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Bonin et al v. Sabine River Authority of Texas
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Perry Bonin , Ace Chandler , Michael . Manuel and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority of Texas and Sabine River Authority of Louisiana
Respondent:
Judy Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Goodwin
as 5:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
Antywane Eric Williams
Defendant:
Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv03680
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Blanchard et al v. TIN, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02823
Plaintiff:
Bailey Blanchard , Lacey Blanchard , Samantha Burge and others
Defendant:
TIN, Inc. and International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Williams v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2012cv00482
Defendant:
Burl Cain, James M. LeBlanc and Amanda Smith
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
as 2:2012cv00670
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodarick Lyles v. City of Dallas, et al
as 11-11013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODARICK LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DALLAS, QUAITEMES ERIC WILLIAMS and HIRAM SOLER
Eric Williams v. Department of Correction
as 11-30713
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF LOUISIANA
Lyles v. The City of Dallas et al
as 3:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
Rodarick Lyles
Defendant:
The City of Dallas , Quaitemes Eric Williams and Hiram Soler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Arlington et al
as 3:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Eric Williams
Defendant:
City of Arlington, Arlington Police and National Football League
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
