Cases 21 - 30 of 1,426
Hamilton v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department, State of Texas and Jefferson County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Beaumont Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department, Jefferson County Sheriff Department and State of Texas
Plaintiff:
Marcus Anthony Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt et al v. Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brad Merritt, Billy Cunningham, Daniel Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Hamilton-Ryker IT Solutions, LLC
Mozee v. Chandler et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'Neal Mozee
Defendant:
Jennifer Hamilton and Nathan Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Erika M. Ealy
Defendant:
Bobby Hamilton and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hamilton v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Jerry Wayne Hamilton
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Campa v. Lauderdale-Hamilton, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Robert Campa
Defendant:
Lauderdale-Hamilton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Devore et al v. Nexion Health at Marrero, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Latoya Devore and Richard Hamilton
Defendant:
Nexion Health at Marrero, Inc. doing business as Marrero Healthcare Center and Nexion Health of OHI, Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Nexion Health Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
