Cases 21 - 30 of 1,522
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re medQ, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sharon Klepper, Shelby D. Franklin, Cheri Ramey and others
Defendant:
medQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrison v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 4:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Crystal Harrison
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison County, Mississippi et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Harrison County, Mississippi, City of Biloxi, Mississippi, City of D'Iberville, Mississippi and others
Defendant:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Ramey, et al. v. medQ, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cheri Ramey and Jana Harrison
Defendant:
medQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harrison v. Owens, et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Marco Harrison
Defendant:
Thomas Owens and Trustmark National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Favre v. Harrison County, MS
as 24-60114
Plaintiff:
Noah Don Favre
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Troy Peterson, Sheriff, MBN Agents, ABC to be named and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
