Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Coffman v. Doe (1-2) et al
as 6:2020cv00264
Defendant:
Major FNU Lighten, John Doe, 3 and John Doe (1-2)
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00822
Plaintiff:
Brandon Earl Fields
Defendant:
Bryan Matthews, Gulfport Police Dept, State of Mississippi and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2019cv00606
Plaintiff:
Sharron Hawkins
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Chief Robert Kirklin, Officer John Does 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Amica General Agency, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00497
Defendant:
Geico Insurance Agency, Inc., John Doe 1&2, Mary McLaurin and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Walker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hereford v. Summit Hotel OP, LP et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Plaintiff:
Demetria Hereford
Defendant:
William "Doe", John Does 1&2, Summit Hotel TRS 064, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ardoin v. Obregon et al
as 4:2019cv02234
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ardoin
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, Texas, Juan Obregon, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tymr Abdullah v. State of Texas, et al
as 19-50552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYMR ABDULLAH
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES 1, 2 AND 3, JOHN GAUNTT, MAGISTRATE GRADE 1 and others
Tymr Abdullah v. County Jail, et al
as 19-50548
Defendant / Appellee:
LAMPASAS DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JOHN DOES 1, 2 AND 3, MAGISTRATE GRADE 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYMR ABDULLAH
Hereford v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00360
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc., William "Doe", John Does 1 & 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Demetria Hereford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abdullah v. County Jail et al
as 6:2018cv00378
Defendant:
AJ Garcia, Lampasas District Attorney, B. Pomeroy and others
Plaintiff:
Tymr Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
