Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00531
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PCC SBH Sub, Inc. v. South Boots Hill, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00385
Defendant:
Aqualand Development LLC, Karnes Logistics LLC, Mark Smith and others
Plaintiff:
PCC SBH Sub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Vessell v. Collier et al
as 6:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
Leon D. Vessell
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Balden Polk, S. Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Berry, et al v. Fred Cannon, et al
as 16-20685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVE CARLTON and SHARON KEGERREIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED CANNON, JOHN K. KARNES and VINOD KHOSLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Poole v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2016cv01165
Plaintiff:
Quinton Donel Poole
Defendant:
Mitchell, Barrette, Karne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Lincoln Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2016cv01029
Plaintiff:
Quinton Donel Poole
Defendant:
Lincoln Parish Detention Center, Susan Cambell, Pam Torbor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Polk et al
as 6:2016cv00951
Plaintiff:
Allen Young
Defendant:
Baldwin Polk, Johnny Armstrong and Stephanie Karnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Black and Pink et al
as 1:2016cv00390
Defendant:
Black and Pink, Ellis County Clerk Office, Fontana Distribution and others
Plaintiff:
Dayrin Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Karnes County, Texas, et al
as 5:2016cv00203
Defendant:
Robert C. Ebrom, Jr., Karnes County, Texas, David Morin and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ray Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
