Cases 21 - 30 of 273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Kemp v. Honeyville Grain Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Bobby M Kemp
Defendant:
Honeyville Grain Inc. and Sola Bread Co
Fezio et al v. Degan et al
as 2:2022cv06249
Plaintiff:
John M. Fezio, Matthew M. Mize, Rajan Pandit and others
Petitioner:
Peter B. Freiberg
Defendant:
Sidney W. Degan, Larry E. Mobley, Linda Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Weathers v. Stiefer et al
as 6:2022cv00387
Plaintiff:
David Weathers
Defendant:
Kurt Stiefer, Penny Kemp, Charles Meador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Stiefer et al
as 3:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
David Weathers
Defendant:
Kurt Stiefer, Penny Kemp, Charles Meador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone et al v. Kemp et al
as 7:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone, Hattie Byrd, Eddie Byrd and others
Respondent:
Brian Kemp, Jimmy S Smith and Georgia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mejia v. Kemp
as 2:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Rene Mejia
Defendant:
Kemp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latney v. Clarke County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Latney
Defendant:
Clarke County Jail, Sheriff Todd Kemp, Berry White and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Baton Rouge, Lallie Kemp Regional Medical Center, East Baton Rouge, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
