Cases 21 - 30 of 745
Weathersby v Regimbal
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Antonio R. Weathersby
Defendant:
Martin J. Regimbal and Kullman Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. ASI Lloyds
as 24-40020
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wright and Dick Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wright v. ASI Lloyds
as 23-40719
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Wright and Dick Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Elizabeth WrightIn re: Elizabeth Wright
as 23-40712
Petitioner:
In re: Elizabeth Wright and Dick Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Respondent:
ASI Lloyds
Diggles v. Lindsay Law Firm
as 23-20594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Latosha Diggles
Defendant / Appellee:
Lindsay Law Firm P.L.L.C., Texas Farmers Insurance Company, Ninth Court of Appeals and others
Haywood v. Texas Realtor
as 23-11240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tianikwa Haywood and Paul-Douglas Celestine
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Realtor, Ceo or Owner, Mackie Wolf Zientz & Mann, P.C. Law Firm, Sanford & Kurland, Owner of Pennymac Loan Services, L.L.C. and others
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 5:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fenelon et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 6:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L Fenelon and Barbara Fenelon Jackson
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, U S Dept of Justice, James Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diggles v. Lindsay Law Firm PLLC et al
as 4:2023cv04546
Plaintiff:
Latosha Diggles
Defendant:
Lindsey Law Firm PLLC, Texas Farmers Insurance Company, Ninth Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
