Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Bagby v. Fathi
as 4:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
David Fathi, Judge Name Unknown, Lee H Rosenthal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagby v. Thaler et al
as 2:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Cedric Wayne Bagby
Defendant:
Rick (Rick) Thaler, Sr and Lee H Rosenthal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Atlas et al
as 4:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jerry Don Williams
Defendant:
Nancy F Atlas and Lee H. Rosenthal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Biloxi Housing Authority et al
as 1:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Gene A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Biloxi Housing Authority , Jack Hillensbeck , U.S. Department of Housing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Santos v. Evergreen Allliance Golf Limited, LP et al
as 4:2011cv04611
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Pita Santos
Defendant:
Evergreen Allliance Golf Limited, LP, Texas Workforce Commission, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ford et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2011cv00670
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ford, Jr. , Lee H Bell , Earnest E Bush and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Santos v. Hoyt et al
as 4:2011cv02547
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Pita Santos
Defendant:
Kenneth M Hoyt, Nancy F Atlas, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Santos v. Hoyt. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 11-309. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN 11cv2547.
as 4:2011mc00309
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Pita Santos
Defendant:
Kenneth M Hoyt, Nancy F Atlas, Eric Holder and others
Santos v. Harmon et al
as 4:2011cv02178
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Pita Santos
Defendant:
Melinda Harmon, David J Bradley, William K Suter and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Villegas v. Galloway et al
as 4:2010cv02906
Plaintiff:
Pete Joe Villegas
Defendant:
Phillip Galloway, Elizabeth Eppie, M Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
