Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014mc00007
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Niblock v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00097
Defendant:
5 Jane/John Does, Farrah Massey, Mike Pearce and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Niblock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Stephens
as 4:2013cv00071
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Travis Mark Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al v. Floyd County, TX et al
as 5:2013cv00219
Defendant:
Floyd County, TX, Alliance for Sterilizing Any Pet , James Paul Glasson and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith , Sandra Smith and Kory Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Moxley
as 1:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Travis Mark Smith
Defendant:
John Moxley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks et al v. National Football League et al
as 3:2012cv00761
Plaintiff:
Estes Banks , Eugene Bowen , Joshua Burr and others
Defendant:
National Football League and NFL Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Floyd County, Texas et al
as 5:2011cv00214
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith , Sandra Smith and Kory Smith
Defendant:
Floyd County, Texas , Tali Jackson , Donald Duffield Feare, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall et al v. Zimmer U S Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00715
Plaintiff:
Jack Stovall and Gia Stovall
Defendant:
Zimmer U S Inc , Zimmer Inc , Zimmer Production Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
