Cases 21 - 30 of 2,978
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America v. Ibarra et al
as 5:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Mark Anthony Ibarra, Raymond Munoz Martinez, Meinhardt Stavilizing Company aka Perma Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Raymond v. Flagstar Bank
as 24-50116
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Raymond
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, M. Samuel Daffin, II, In their official capacity as trustee of assets, Mary A. Daffin, In their official capacity as trustee of assets and others
Mann v. Young et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Raymond William Mann
Defendant:
Michael Young, Jonathan Watkins and Bexar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatten v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hatten
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 23-11267
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Adam Gonzalez
Aguilar v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Aguilar, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strong v. Paradise, et al.,
as 3:2023cv02847
Plaintiff:
Lyna Strong
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc and Raymond Paradise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mason v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Christopher Uledau, Bryan Rietsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10087
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, res
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
