Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Schofield v. Caldwell Correctional Center et al
as 3:2016cv00717
Plaintiff:
Morris Demond Schofield
Defendant:
Caldwell Correctional Center and Micheal Crain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Caldwell Correctional Center et al
as 3:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Morris D Schofield
Defendant:
Caldwell Correctional Center and Cleve Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield et al v. Caldwell Correctional Center et al
as 3:2016cv00021
Defendant:
Caldwell Correctional Center and Cleve Grant
Plaintiff:
Morris D. Schofield and Timmy Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yarbrough et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02297
Plaintiff:
Linda Yarbrough , Susie Lykken , Debra Lyles and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Danley et al v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2015cv01354
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Dana Danley , Dorothy Abrams , Bernice Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schofield v. Lee et al
as 3:2015cv00915
Plaintiff:
Morris Schofield
Defendant:
Chad Lee and Sonya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Schofield v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-40331
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD WAYNE SCHOFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
USA v. Nicholas Schofield
as 14-11293
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NICHOLAS W. SCHOFIELD
Schofield v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 4:2014cv02874
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Schofield
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Glenn Ruston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willrich v. Northwestern California University Law School et al
as 4:2014cv00357
Plaintiff:
Candace Willrich
Defendant:
Northwestern California University Law School, Michael Clancey and Mary Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
