Cases 21 - 30 of 249
Searcy v. Progressive Insurance
as 3:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
Candace Searcy
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02488
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Ellen D Dotson, Cheryl B Manning and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
San Miguel v. McLane
as 22-10517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Center, Executive Director, Michael Searcy, Racheal Kingston and others
Miguel v. Abbott
as 22-50413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Abbott, Texas Governor, Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Center Office, Executive Director, Michael Searcy, Texas Civil Commitment Center Office, Operation Spec. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Searcy v. Orchard National Title
as 22-10122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Candace Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Orchard National Title
Searcy v. Sedera Title
as 3:2021cv02542
Plaintiff:
Candace Searcy
Defendant:
Sedera Title
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Searcy v. Drug Enforcement Agcy
as 21-20540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Harris County Sheriff's Department, Department of Justice and others
Searcy v. Trochessett
as 3:2021cv00265
Petitioner:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Respondent:
Henry Trochessett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Searcy v. Trochesset
as 3:2021cv00266
Petitioner:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Respondent:
Henry Trochesset
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
