Cases 21 - 30 of 380
McGee v. Barton
as 23-30458
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dumauriea L. McGee
Defendant / Appellee:
Trent Barton, Assistant Warden, Marcus Jones, Major, Gabriel Hebert, Major and others
USA v. Willis
as 23-40363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Trent Ashley Willis
USOR Site PRP Group v. City of Pasadena, Texas et al
as 4:2023cv01867
Defendant:
Inframark, LLC, City of Pasadena, Texas and Severn Trent
Plaintiff:
USOR Site PRP Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Hamilton v. Orr
as 23-30270
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Hamilton
Defendant / Appellee:
John Orr, Trent Barton, Luke Rheams and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
LaPlante v. Karun Eyewear Inc et al
as 3:2023cv00517
Defendant:
Karun Eyewear Inc doing business as Karun US Inc also known as Karun World, Karun World and Thomas Kimber
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Trent LaPlante
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Muhammad v. Fertitta Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
FATARA MUHAMMAD, Curtis Jamison, Kenneth Douglas and others
Defendant:
FERTITTA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., LANDRY'S INC., MCCORMICK & SCHMICK RESTAURANT CORP., d/b/a MASTRO'S STEAKHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Chaput v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Nicholas-Trent: Chaput
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
