Cases 31 - 40 of 184
Mitchell v. PD Code 21 et al
as 3:2021cv03018
Plaintiff:
Dupree Armand Mitchell
Defendant:
PD Code 21, Aylee go Serch and Seeger, City of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson v. Straughn et al
as 5:2021cv00295
Petitioner:
Michael Brandon-Elzie Nelson
Respondent:
FNU 5:21-CV-295 Straughn and FNU 5:21-CV-295 Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saylors v. Bryant et al
as 1:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wayne Saylors
Defendant:
FNU Bryant, FNU Alverez, FNU Nozbonimpa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frosch v. Cowan et al
as 1:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
George Edward Harry Frosch
Defendant:
Jeff Cowan, FNU LNU 1:21cv-211-1 and FNU LNU 1:21-CV-211-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Stow
as 5:2021cv00284
Plaintiff:
Joseph Howard Stewart
Defendant:
Doctor NFN 5:21-CV-284 Stow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Felix v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al
as 5:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Martinez-Felix
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation (MTC), Warden Doe John 5:21-CV-282 and Doe John 5:21-CV-282
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vizcayno v. Doe 7:21-CV-105-O
as 7:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Guadalupe Vizcayno
Defendant:
John Doe 7:21-CV-105-O, Sgt. Brice Byrd, C.O. Alejo Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCall v. LaSalle Corrections Rolling Plains Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
Rafi Wali McCall
Defendant:
LaSalle Corrections Rolling Plains Detention Center, Judith Bennett, FNU Shaginaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieto v. Use of Force Team on Robertson Unit et al
as 1:2021cv00197
Plaintiff:
Raymond Nieto, Jr
Defendant:
Use of Force Team on Robertson Unit, B Pulliam, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobos v. Doe 7:21-cv-102-O
as 7:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cobos
Defendant:
John Doe 7:21-cv-102-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
