Cases 31 - 40 of 2,145
Nelson v. Sollie
as 22-60461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jarrett Romero Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
Billy Sollie, Melissa McCarter, Mary Jo Robinson and others
Adeyinka v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2022cv02219
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Armstrong, Brady Barrs, C. Aquilera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Barr et al
as 3:2022cv00735
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Defendant:
B.B. Barr and Vinida Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Rene v. Clifford Barr et al
as 4:2022cv00853
Defendant:
Roderick Clifford Barr and Spaulding Logistics Express
Plaintiff:
Reanna Rene
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Noblewood IP LLC v. Pure Barre, LLC
as 4:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Noblewood IP LLC
Defendant:
Pure Barre, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yogi Metals Group v. Garland
as 21-20615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yogi Metals Group, Incorporated and Vinod Moorjani
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Rodriguez v. Hoar Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00065
Plaintiff:
Geronimo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Hoar Construction, LLC and Bradley Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tabor v. Hooper
as 21-30582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Joseph Tabor
Defendant / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Betty Johnson, Warden, Todd Barre, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
