Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Boswell v. Lumpkin
as 22-40267
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mickey Wayne Boswell
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Boswell et al v. Progressive Property Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
Brandon Boswell and Danielle Chenevert
Defendant:
Progressive Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Paige v. Hudspeth Regional Center (Boswell) et al
as 3:2021cv00618
Plaintiff:
Sharon Paige
Defendant:
Hudspeth Regional Center (Boswell), Director Jerrie Barnes and Director Keesha Lowe Nash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 4:2020cv02918
Plaintiff:
Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell, Michelle Knight and others
Defendant:
Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Treppel Family Trust U/A 08/18/18 et al v. Dinges et al
as 4:2021cv03053
Plaintiff:
Treppel Family Trust U/A, Lawrence A. Treppel and Geri D. Treppel
Defendant:
Dan O. Dinges, Scott C Schroeder, Rhys J. Best and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boswell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
Kylie Boswell
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boswell v. Goodwin
as 21-30441
Petitioner / Appellant:
Donald M. Boswell
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
Ezell v. Dinges et al
as 4:2021cv02046
Defendant:
Rhys J. Best, Peter B. Delaney, Amanda M. Brock and others
Interested Party:
Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jody Ezell, Leon Fischer and Robert Isaacs
Petitioner:
John Hudson
Boswell v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00068
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Mickey Wayne Boswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
