Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Smith v. Washington
as 3:2019cv00826
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Unknown Washington
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brooks et al
as 3:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Latasha Brooks, Tirah Mixon, Vivian Evans and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. King et al
as 1:2019cv00117
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Ronald King
Petitioner:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00243
Defendant:
James Fillyaw, William Moody, Deputy Warden Vivian Frazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassandra Hall v. Texas Hlth and Human Svc Cmsn, et al
as 19-20242
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID KOSTROUN, CHRIS ADAMS, CHARLES SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSANDRA LYNN HALL
Smith v. Rhodes et al
as 3:2019cv00260
Defendant:
Tyler Smith, Unknown Fletcher, Unknown Morris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Ladner et al
as 3:2019cv00208
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Vivian Frazer, Deputy Warden James Fillyaw, Warden Brian Ladner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
20/20 Communications, Inc. v. Randall Blevins, et al
as 19-10050
Defendant / Appellee:
BRINA HEALY, REDWAN NEGASH, CHARLES SMITH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
20/20 COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Smith v. Bradley et al
as 4:2018cv00192
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Pelicia Hall, Mr. Turner, Warden Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
