Cases 31 - 40 of 190
Duarte v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas, Robert Mclore, Sharon Mcarae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Texas Association for the Rights of the Unemployed et al v. Texas Workforce Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Texas Association for the Rights of the Unemployed, Kathryn Kawazoe, Stephanie Stout and others
Defendant:
Texas Workforce Commission and Edward Serna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maria Duarte GodinezIn re: Maria Duarte Godinez
as 22-60052
Petitioner:
In re: Maria Teresa Duarte Godinez
USA v. Duarte
as 22-10003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Duarte, Jr.
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Roll-Lift USA Inc et al
as 1:2021cv00581
Defendant:
Roll-Lift USA, Inc, Entergy Texas, Inc., Bright Star Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
USA v. Duarte-Munoz
as 21-51114
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Victor Manuel Duarte-Munoz
Camacho v. Duarte Torres
as 1:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jose Camacho
Defendant:
Heber Duarte Torres, Jesus Evaristo Guerra, E. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. Stengel et al
as 5:2021cv00885
Petitioner:
Richard F. Duarte, Jr.
Respondent:
Frank Stengel, State of Texas, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. v. Duse Export, LLC et al
as 7:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. doing business as Robinson Fresh
Defendant:
Duse Export, LLC and Irma B. Duarte
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
USA v. Herrera-Duarte
as 21-10764
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Sergio Herrera-Duarte, also known as Ezequiel Herrera Arzate, also known as Primo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
