Cases 31 - 40 of 411
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Robinson et al v. Wells Fargo et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Denny L. Robinson, Gustavo Amaro, Angel Obregon and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, Albert Yagubyan, Artashes Darbinyan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Sorrells
as 4:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jamalle Donntai Gibson
Defendant:
District Attorney Phil Sorrells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Chaisson et al
as 2:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Ashley Jamal Harris
Defendant:
Dy Chaisson, Terrebonne Parish Jail and Rhonda Ledet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Wilson
as 4:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
Jamalle Donntai Gibson
Defendant:
Sharen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Mount et al
as 2:2022cv06206
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Supervisor Mount, Deputy Jang, Deputy Red and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Abdo
as 22-51034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Naser Jason Jamal Abdo, also known as Naser Jason Abdo
Abdo v. USA
as 6:2022cv01147
Plaintiff:
Naser Jason Jamal Abdo
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dayries et al v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv03522
Plaintiff:
Monique Dayries and Jamall Dayries
Defendant:
Allied Trust Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Tyson Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
