Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Jones v. Strong et al
as 4:2018cv00953
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jones
Defendant:
Kelly Strong, Loaiza Todd, Shalester Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Warner et al
as 4:2018cv00831
Petitioner:
Charles E. Lusk
Defendant:
Carlisietta R. Warner and Alicia Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daves et al v. Dallas County Texas et al
as 3:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
Shannon Daves , Shakena Walston , Erriyah Banks and others
Defendant:
Dallas County Texas , Marian Brown , Terrie McVea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Medicredit Inc.
as 4:2017cv03701
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Young and Christopher Lusk
Defendant:
Medicredit Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Charles Lusk v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-40626
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD LUSK
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Hollan et al v. Thunderbird Resources, LP
as 2:2017cv00444
Plaintiff:
Billy Hollan and Joey Lusk
Defendant:
Thunderbird Resources, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Patterson v. Texas Stain & Polish LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
Wade Patterson
Defendant:
Texas Stain & Polish LLC and Monte Lusk
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pixsy Inc. et al v. CGI Communications, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00925
Defendant:
CGI Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Daniel Foster, Aaron Lusk and Pixsy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Lusk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2016cv00459
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Lusk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooke et al v. Meritor, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00054
Plaintiff:
Katherine Longstreet Cooke , Shirley Nevitte , Stacy H. Bridges and others
Defendant:
Meritor, Inc. , Textron, Inc. and Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
