Cases 31 - 40 of 3,223
Jackson v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Jackson
Defendant:
Blaine Mitchell Parker and Parker Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10250
Petitioner:
Darrell Boyd Mitchell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Howell v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
April Mae Howell
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Delbert Hosemann, Secretary of State Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
Stephanie Nicole Mitchell, Chika Anyiam, Dallas County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Young v. Vega
as 24-50190
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradley Young
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Vega, FNU Decker, RN Health Safety Administrator, FNU Mitchel, Burse and others
King v. USA
as 3:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Mitchell Ray King, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mitchell v. Thom's Transport Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Lutrell Mitchell
Defendant:
Thom's Transport Company, Inc., Jack Reavis Howell, Jr. and Fictitious Defendants A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Coleman v. Blissett
as 24-10216
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Coleman
Defendant:
Brenda Blissett, Curtis Mitchell and Alias Operator/Owner
Vaughan v. Monsour
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Walton Stephen Vaughan
Defendant:
Mitchell Monsour
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
