Cases 31 - 40 of 2,773
Morris v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Morris
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and David Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Fiesta Mart, LLC
as 3:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jackie Morris
Defendant:
Fiesta Mart LLC
Other:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Bellard v. University of Texas
as 24-40161
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bellard, Craig Messick and Barbra Speer
Defendant:
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Peter W.T. Pisters, President, in his official and individual capacities, Rosanna Morris, Chief Operating Officer, in her official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Terrell v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Morris Andre Terrell
Defendant:
Sheriff Unknown Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brumfield et al v. American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida et al
as 2:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Maxine Brumfield, Morris Bart, LLC and Maxine Brumfield
Defendant:
American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida and 21st Mortgage Corporation
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Rankins v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Bernice Rankins and Morris Bart LLC
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Reverse Mortgage Funding, LLC and State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
