Cases 31 - 40 of 199
ETG Aviation, LLC et al v. Pilot Point Consultancy, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01418
Defendant:
Does 1-20, Textron Aviation Inc., Castine Airways, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TP Host, LLC and ETG Aviation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hester v. Bell-Textron
as 20-11140
Defendant / Appellee:
Bell-Textron, Incorporated.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James R. Hester
Perez v. Textron Aviation Inc
as 3:2020cv02818
Intervenor Defendant:
Safelight Holdings LLC, Corvus Aircraft Inc, Sportshares West LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Perez
Defendant:
Textron Aviation Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Natasha Giddings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bell Textron Inc v. K&S Helicopters, Inc.
as 4:2020cv01029
Plaintiff:
Bell Textron Inc
Defendant:
K&S Helicopters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Bell Helicopter Textron
as 4:2020cv00226
Plaintiff:
Wendell Newton
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hester v. Bell-Textron, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00514
Plaintiff:
James R. Hester
Defendant:
Bell-Textron and Bell-Textron, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Apollo Medflight, LLC et al v. Textron Aviation, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00561
Plaintiff:
Integra Aviation, LLC, Apollo Medflight, LLC and TCP One, LLC
Defendant:
Textron Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Bell Textron Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00292
Defendant:
Safran Helicopter Engines USA Inc, Safran USA Inc and Bell Textron Inc
Plaintiff:
Timothy Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Bell Helicopter Textron
as 3:2020cv00584
Plaintiff:
Wendell Newton
Defendant:
Bell Helicopter Textron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Forti v. Bell Textron Inc et al
as 3:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
Hope Forti
Defendant:
Safran Helicopter Engines, S.A., Safran USA, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
