Cases 31 - 40 of 155
Davis v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01523
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garner v. Moore et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
Willi Free I Garner
Defendant:
Candace Moore, Lorie W Davis, Carol E Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bright et al
as 5:2013cv00888
Defendant:
Kenneth Bright, Warden Calvin W. Davis, Samuel Longoria and others
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Bossier Parish et al
as 5:2013cv02653
Plaintiff:
Luther W Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Police Jury Bossier Parish, Linton Jacobs, Robert Chavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bright et al
as 2:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Kenneth Bright, Calvin W. Davis, Miguel Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. British Petroleum PLC, et al
as 2:2013cv02326
Plaintiff:
Harry W Davis
Defendant:
British Petroleum PLC, BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and BP American Production Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701 - Oil Pollution Act
Davis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00780
Plaintiff:
David W. Davis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cornelius Hudson v. Fred Davi
as 12-11095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRED W. DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
