Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Singletary v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2016cv03476
Plaintiff:
Charleston Singletary
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Judge Strickland, Paul Weinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Singletary v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2016mc01671
Plaintiff:
Charleston Singletary
Defendant:
State of Texas, Judge Strickland, Attorney Paul Weinstein and others
BC Liquidating, LLC v. Lloyd J Weinstein et al
as 4:2016mc01307
Plaintiff:
BC Liquidating, LLC
Defendant:
Lloyd J Weinstein, The Weinstein Group, P C, Karen Sharf and others
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Verrilli, Jr. et al
as 4:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein and Anthony J Balistreri
Defendant:
Donald Verrilli, Jr., Loretta Lynch, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Steven Weinstein v. William Stephens, Director
as 16-20018
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN MARK WEINSTEIN
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Max Blu Technologies, LLC v. The Weinstein Company LLC
as 2:2015cv01384
Plaintiff:
Max Blu Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
The Weinstein Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
D'Aquin v. Norris et al
as 2:2015cv00761
Plaintiff:
Thomas L D'Aquin
Defendant:
John Fahrman , Catherine Kahrs, Brett Stoltz and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Weinstein et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03016
Plaintiff:
Rena Weinstein and Howard Weinstein
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00120
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Weinstein v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv01079
Petitioner:
Steven Mark Weinstein
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
