Cases 41 - 50 of 11,656
Wesley v. Texas Office of Attorney General
as 4:2024cv00557
Respondent:
Texas Office of Attorney General
Petitioner:
Jason Wesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Campbell v. MDOC et al
as 4:2024cv00073
Respondent:
MDOC and Attorney General State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Keisha L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez Aldana v. Garland
as 24-60405
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Vicente Eulofio Gomez Aldana
Zeng, et al., v. Mayorkas, et al.
as 4:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Yukun Zeng and Yang Liu
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Escobedo-Rubio v. Garland
as 24-60408
Petitioner:
Jose Refugio Escobedo-Rubio
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Grady v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Respondent:
Jim Hood, State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and others
Petitioner:
Christopher Grady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GH America Energy LLC v. Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
GH America Energy LLC
Defendant:
Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc., Attorney General Ken Paxton, Pablo Vegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
American Financial Network, Inc. v. Ramos et al
as 4:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
American Financial Network, Inc.
Defendant:
The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Jesus A Ramos, Yvonne Sepulveda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Perez-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-60402
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
Dina Raquel Perez-Rodriguez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
