Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Cell and Network Selection LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00706
Plaintiff:
Cell and Network Selection LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, HT Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Anthony Young, Jr. v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 11-31166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, DARREL VANNOY, Assistant Warden of Security, JOHN CALVERT, Assistant Warden of Camp J and others
Wiley v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
Senior Warden Ginsel, Texas Dept of Criminal Justice, Unit Health and Safety and Risk Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2011cv00194
Plaintiff:
Willis Floyd Wiley
Defendant:
Senior Warden Ginsel, Unidentified Gordon, Assistant Warden Helm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Luetinent Martinez et al
as 4:2011cv03906
Plaintiff:
Tony Morris Jones
Defendant:
Luetinent Martinez, Luetinent Peacock and Cell Mates
Receiver:
Clay Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coach, Inc. et al v. Cell Phone Repair Center et al
as 6:2011cv00548
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Cell Phone Repair Center and Amishbhail Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Keelen v. Clinton et al
as 3:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
Karston Keelen
Defendant:
Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conish v. Deputy on Shift of Cell 8 and Cell 7
as 3:2008cv02274
Plaintiff:
Travis Dwayne Conish
Defendant:
Deputy on Shift of Cell 8 and Cell 7
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sampson v. Jones et al
as 3:2007cv00512
Plaintiff:
Jackie R. Sampson
Defendant:
Donald Jones, Chad Butler, Tom Milam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
