Cases 41 - 50 of 707
Davis v. McGuire et al
as 3:2022cv01136
Plaintiff:
Londer B Davis
Defendant:
Clyde McGuire, Marshal Security Team and NFN NLN (3:22-cv-1136)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bodwin vs Collier, et al
as 6:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clyde Bodwin
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Juan M Garcia, Michael O McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliam v. Ferrell
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Edd Lonzell Gilliam
Defendant:
Gordon Clyde Ferrell, Jr and D Benton Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Gordillo v. Swalwell IV
as 3:2022cv00846
Petitioner:
Alejandra Katherine Albar Gordillo
Respondent:
Clyde Emerson Swalwell IV
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 9001 International Child Abduction Remedies
Smith v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
jerome clyde smith
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rixner v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Clyde J Rixner and Clyde J. Rixner
Defendant:
DR. Kilolo Kijakazi and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
James Nobles, Jr.In re: James Nobles, Jr.
as 22-60088
Petitioner:
In re: James W. Nobles, Jr. and Angelo Dorizas
Respondent:
Gregory Cole, William M. Cole, Robert Cole and others
Wayne FerrellIn re: Wayne Ferrell
as 22-60083
Petitioner:
In re: Wayne E. Ferrell, Jr.
Respondent:
Gregory Cole, William M. Cole, Robert Cole and others
Miles v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Clyde Dene Miles
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Wayne Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Walmart Inc
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Clyde Jordan
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
