Cases 41 - 50 of 545
Carrier v. R P M Pizza Baton Rouge Inc et al
as 6:2022cv02609
Plaintiff:
Duane Carrier
Defendant:
R P M Pizza Inc, National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh PA and R P M Pizza Baton Rouge L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carrier v. R P M Pizza Baton Rouge Inc et al
as 1:2022cv02609
Plaintiff:
Duane Carrier
Defendant:
R P M Pizza Inc, National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh PA and R P M Pizza Baton Rouge L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berry v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 22-10732
Defendant / Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Appellant:
Duane L. Berry
Berry v. Bank of America
as 22-20379
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Anthony Griffin
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Incorporated, Sebring Capital Partners and others
Appellant:
Duane L. Berry
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thomas v. DHI Home Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Bryant Duane Thomas
Defendant:
DHI Home Mortgage Company, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage and Ginnie Mae
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Hemphill v. President Joseph R. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Jason Duane Hemphill
Defendant:
President Joseph R. Biden and The Executive Branch of the United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hemphill v. Joseph R Biden et al
as 3:2022cv01238
Plaintiff:
Jason Duane Hemphill
Defendant:
The Executive Branch of the United States Government and Joseph R Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mann v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
Original Mann and Cyrus Casby
Defendant:
Ann Montgomery, Bonnie Dubourg, Greg Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
