Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Abdul Khan, et al v. Newell Normand, Sheriff, et al
as 11-30112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL S. KHAN and HAJERA T. KHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWELL NORMAND, as successor to Harry Lee, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jefferson Parish, TIM STIERWALD, Deputy, JOHN O'BRIEN, Deputy and others
Johnson v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2009cv01467
Plaintiff:
Baron Johnson
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Bobby Jindal, Richard Ieyoub and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Jones v. Harry Lee, et al
as 09-30145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH RAYNELL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY LEE, Sheriff, SUE ELLEN PENOUILH, Warden, SPECIAL INVESTIGATION UNIT and others
Jarrow v. Modica, et al
as 09-30013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILSON S JARROW, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ELVIN J MODICA, JR., SEAN CURSAIN and HARRY LEE
Scott v. Lee
as 08-30573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEN H SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY LEE, Sheriff
Sears v. Lee et al
as 2:2008cv03418
Plaintiff:
Patricia Sears, Patricia Sears and Patricia Sears
Defendant:
Harry Lee, Newell Normand and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Lee v. Dell Catalog Sales, LP et al
as 2:2008cv01995
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee
Defendant:
Dell Financial Services, LP, Dell Financial Services, LP, Dell Gen P. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Castillo v. Blanco, et al
as 08-30166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT MARK CASTILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN BABINEAUX BLANCO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, GENIE C POWERS and others
Arinder v. Alvarado et al
as 2:2008cv01136
Plaintiff:
Chris J. Arinder
Defendant:
Julio Alvarado and Harry Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
