Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herron v. Peveto Companies, Ltd.
as 4:2015cv00766
Plaintiff:
James Herron
Defendant:
Peveto Companies, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Helena Chemical Company v. KT Farms Partnership et al
as 3:2014cv02441
Plaintiff:
Helena Chemical Co
Defendant:
K T Farms Partnership, Kyle Aymond, Thad Herron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herron v. Dallas County TX
as 3:2014cv02190
Plaintiff:
Ray E Herron
Defendant:
Dallas County TX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2014cv00587
Plaintiff:
Donna Little , Randy Bayne , Joseph Bourlet and others
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Bedrock Gypsum, BNBM and others
Movant:
Pulte Home Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herron v. U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a division of U.S. Bank National Association
as 5:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Tyler Herron
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Home Mortgage, a division of U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foreman v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2013cv00526
Plaintiff:
Darrenn Foreman
Defendant:
City of Fort Worth, Tom Higgins, Karen Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Herron v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Bobby Herron
Defendant:
Timothy Outlaw, Steve Berry and J. Rayburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herron v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 4:2012cv00727
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company and XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Joyce Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Herron v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00646
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Plaintiff:
William Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
