Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Antoine et al v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00140
Plaintiff:
Betty Antoine , Marie Bolton , Misty M. Bowman and others
Defendant:
CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., DEF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frizzell et al v. DS Corp. et al
as 1:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
Beverly Frizzell, S. G., J. G. and others
Defendant:
DS Corp., Bechtel National, Inc., ABC Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jordan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2009cv00588
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, D. Farley, J. G. Leap and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Latney v. Kemp et al
as 4:2008cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robin Latney
Defendant:
Todd Kemp, J. G. Kufel and Jackie Allbriton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Latney v. Kemp et al
as 4:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Latney
Defendant:
Todd Kemp, J. G. Kufel and Pat Jordan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cleveland v. Union Parish, et al
as 08-30829
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
D'ARBONNE WOODS CHARTER SCHOOL INC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, JAMES V ALLEN, Individually and as President of the Union Parish School Board and J G ELLIOTT
Neely v. State Bar of Texas, et al
as 08-20505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE R NEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF TEXAS, COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, J G MOLLESTON and others
American Piledriving Equipment, Inc. v. J & G Sales, Inc.
as 4:2008cv01253
Plaintiff:
American Piledriving Equipment, Inc.
Defendant:
J & G Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neely v. State Bar of Texas et al
as 4:2007cv04517
Plaintiff:
George R Neely
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, Commission For Lawyer Discipline, J G Molleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
