Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Beggs v. Doe 4:21-cv-1067-P-BU
as 7:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jo Beggs
Defendant:
John Doe 4:21-cv-1067-P-BU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Lozada et al
as 5:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Reno Preston Roberts
Defendant:
Andrea Lozada, David Reed, Jr., Ricardo Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00920
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Coway et al v. Romero et al
as 6:2021cv02125
Plaintiff:
katja coway and Morgan marks
Defendant:
Thomas Romero, Anthony Green, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Louisiana State Police et al
as 3:2021cv01960
Plaintiff:
Audrena Smith and Denise Johnson-Nelson
Defendant:
Louisiana State Police, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Warden FNU Lasada, Officer John Doe 4 721cv33, Officer John Doe 3 721cv33 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Fox et al
as 2:2021cv00856
Defendant:
City of Hammond, Louisiana, Officer John Doe 3, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 4:21-cv-581-P v. The University of Texas at Arlington et al
as 4:2021cv00581
Defendant:
Stefan Anton Romanoschi, Dayna Ford, R. Stephen Gibbs and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe 4:21-cv-581-P
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan et al v. Gautreaux et al
as 3:2021cv00048
Defendant:
John Doe #5, CorrectHealth, East Baton Rouge Parish and others
Plaintiff:
Sahara Claiborne, Shaheedra Jordan and Leiaja Claiborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Hernandez et al
as 1:2020cv01173
Defendant:
Vivint Inc., Dr. M. Burrows, Wal-Mart Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wynston Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
