Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Branson v. Behrns et al
as 3:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Guy D Branson
Defendant:
Robert Behrns, Kent Dickerson, Robert Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redd v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff:
Calvin Redd
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, Medical Staff of Correctional Corp of America, Correctional Corp of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00482
Plaintiff:
Consuelo L. Walker
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Deborah Schwartz, Substitute Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2012cv00012
Defendant:
Linda Carranza-Gonzales, David O. Chavez, Joehassin Cordero, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Murphey et al
as 2:2011cv00226
Petitioner:
Ronnie Ray Strong
Respondent:
Smith Murphey, David L. Walker and Hale James, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnny Gregory v. C. McKennon, et al
as 11-11021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE GREGORY
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MCKENNON, Warden, Lindsey State Jail, J. BLACKWOOD, Captain, G. JAMES, Captain and others
Walker v. Pigeon et al
as 3:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
Edwin L. Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Peggy Pigeon, Jessie Streeter, Thomas Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Webco Industries, Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
Freddie L Walker, Sr
Defendant:
Webco Industries, Inc, Sally Allen, Patti Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walker-El v Tamez et,al
as 3:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
James L Walker-El
Defendant:
Rebecca Tamez, Jason A Sickler and S Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart v. Guzman et al
as 1:2011cv00036
Plaintiff:
Shawn A. Stewart
Defendant:
Joaquin Guzman, Patrick Martin, Cory G Clinkenbeard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
