Cases 41 - 50 of 1,164
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon v. Maryman et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Defendant:
Julie Neal Maryman and James Maryman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Neal v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Elijah Neal
Defendant:
Warden Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dandona v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Neal Dandona
Defendant:
AIG Property Casulty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Glaspie v. Ermatinger
as 23-10099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Neal Glaspie
Defendant / Appellee:
Cindy Ermatinger, Judge of 443rd District Court, Janet Traylor, Attorney, John Fehler and others
Counts v. Neal et al
as 6:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Randall Allan Counts
Defendant:
Barbra C Neal, Bobby Lumpkin, LaMorris Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Foust
as 23-40396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Israel Antonio Torres
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith Foust, Netty Angella, Lonnie E. Townsend, VI and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Martin v. Busby
as 2:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Daniel Neal Martin
Respondent:
Larry R Busby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Marburger et al
as 5:2021cv00285
Defendant:
Sherry Marburger, Gary Marburger, Sally Marburger Perkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Guardian Ad Litem:
Jennifer Arlene Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
