Cases 41 - 50 of 468
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01693
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Newton
as 22-10513
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Garry Dewayne Newton, also known as #4
Molina et al v. Bastrop County, et al.
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Eunice Prieto Molina and Leidi Silvestre
Defendant:
Bastrop County Sheriff's Office, Chris Griffin, Stevie Shae Burchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. ASI Lloyds
as 4:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Tonya Newton
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Williams v. Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kwaylon Demaris Williams
Defendant:
Vincent A. Allen, Bryan Williams, A. Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Crosby County 72nd District Court et al
as 5:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marvin E Newton
Defendant:
Crosby County 72nd District Court, DFPS and Molina Crystal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Newton v. USA
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Royce Newton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Chandler-Newton et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-OPT1, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-OPT1 and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Annette F. Chandler-Newton, Gonzalez Financial Holdings, Inc., and GFH, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
