Cases 51 - 60 of 126
Broderick et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv06552
Plaintiff:
Sherri Broderick , Susan W. Gretz , Lourds D. Guidry and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UBS Financial Services, Inc v. Broderick, et al
as 2:2016cv02813
Plaintiff:
UBS Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Alithia Broderick, Loreen Parker, Elain Voss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Robinson v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00655
Petitioner:
Broderick Robinson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bridges et al v. Absolute Lawn Care LA, LLC
as 2:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tony Bridges , Jonas Theophile , Derek Chairs and others
Defendant:
Absolute Lawn Care LA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216
Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. v. Broderick
as 4:2015cv00706
Plaintiff:
Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A.
Defendant:
Michael W Broderick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Broderick Howard v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 15-30870
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRODERICK HOWARD
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Salcido et al v. Harris County et al
as 4:2015cv02155
Plaintiff:
Casandra Salcido , Denise Collins , Kenneth Lucas and others
Defendant:
Harris County, Xavier Deputy Levingston, Broderick Officer Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broderick Williams v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20154
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRODERICK D'EARL WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Burton v. Cain et al
as 2:2015cv00371
Plaintiff:
Broderick Burton
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
