Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Farrish et al v. Price et al
as 3:2016cv00045
Plaintiff: Mark Farrish and Katherine Farrish
Defendant: Jackson L. Price, Jr. and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-10803
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAY AUBREY ISAAC HOLLIS, Individually and as Trustee of the Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis Revocable Living Trust
Defendant - Appellee: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States and THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Jay Isaac Hollis v. Loretta Lynch
as 15-10803
Defendant / Appellee: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States and THOMAS E. BRANDON, Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Amicus Curiae: FIREARMS POLICY FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED, BRADLEY D. ROGERS, MADISON SOCIETY, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAY AUBREY ISAAC HOLLIS, Individually and as Trustee of the Jay Aubrey Isaac Hollis Revocable Living Trust
Fredric Mance, Jr., et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-10311
Plaintiff - Appellee: FREDRIC RUSSELL MANCE, JR., TRACEY AMBEAU HANSON, ANDREW HANSON and others
Defendant - Appellant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and B. TODD JONES, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Fredric Mance, Jr., et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 15-10311
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: TRACEY AMBEAU HANSON, CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, FREDRIC RUSSELL MANCE, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellant: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, B. TODD JONES, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
CF Industries, Inc. et al v. The Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
as 6:2014cv00392
Plaintiff: CF Industries Sales, LLC and CF Industries, Inc.
Defendant: The Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Stanford v. U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2014cv00040
Plaintiff: Michael Shane Stanford
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice - Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno d/b/a CWS Country Wide Shooters v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00089
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Notice Only Party: Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff: Valerie Moreno d/b/a CWS Country Wide Shooters
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 923 - Review of Firearms Licensing
Brandon Gun and Pawn, LLC v. Holder, Jr. et al
as 3:2013cv00628
Plaintiff: Brandon Gun and Pawn, LLC
Defendant: Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice - Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and Matthew D. Wren
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
National Rifle Association, et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, et al
as 11-10959
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, MOTHERS AGAINST TEEN VIOLENCE, STUDENTS FOR GUN-FREE SCHOOLS IN TEXAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, ANDREW M. PAYNE, REBEKAH JENNINGS and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS, AND EXPLOSIVES, KENNETH MELSON, In His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?