Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Walker-El v Tamez et,al
as 4:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
James L Walker-El
Defendant:
Rebecca Tamez, Jason A Sickler and S Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnny Gregory v. C. McKennon, et al
as 10-11128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE GREGORY
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MCKENNON, Warden, Lindsey State Jail, J. BLACKWOOD, Captain, G. JAMES, Captain and others
Adams et al v. Columbus Lumber Company, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Adams , Olgert Akmenkalas , Pertrell Arnold and others
Defendant:
Columbus Lumber Company, LLC, Brookhaven Sawmill Company, H. Ross Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins v. Lewis et al
as 2:2010cv00118
Petitioner:
James Collins
Respondent:
Cassandra L. Lewis, Micheal Horan, David L. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCalllup v. Wilson et al
as 3:2010cv00367
Plaintiff:
Veronica McCalllup
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Howard Wilson Jeep Dealership, Insurance Company of Howard Wilson Jeep Dealership and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gregory v. McKennon et al
as 4:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Gregory
Defendant:
C McKennon, J Blackwood, G James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester Walker v. Timothy Geithner
as 10-10191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER L. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY GEITHNER, Secretary, United States Department of Treasury
Walker-El v. Barnett
as 3:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
James L Walker-El
Defendant:
Twyla Barnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Certified Companies Inc.
as 4:2009cv02481
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Walker
Defendant:
Certified Companies Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
