Cases 51 - 58 of 58
USA v. Castaneda
as 08-40212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY CASTANEDA, also known as Tony Castaneda
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Smith v. Harrison County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2007cv01256
Plaintiff:
Lashun Smith
Defendant:
Harrison County, Mississippi, Harrison County Sheriff Department, George Payne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southeast Supply Header, LLC v. 39.5 Acres in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00244
Plaintiff:
Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC, Southeast Supply Header, LLC and others
Defendant:
39.5 Acres in Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi, Carsie Lott, Louis Young Lott and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Ward v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv01232
Petitioner:
Paul Anthony Ward
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castaneda v. USA
as 4:2007cv00027
Petitioner:
Paul Anthony Castaneda
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ellis v. Quarterman
as 06-41475
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Williams v. LTD Financial Svc, et al
as 4:2004cv01644
Plaintiff:
Constance Williams, Lana K. Harris, Vicki Lynn Shephard and others
Defendant:
LTD Financial Services I Inc and LTD Financial Services LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
