Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Tekgigz LLC et al v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Tekgigz LLC and Advanced Resource Staffing Inc
Defendant:
Chad F Wolf, Department of Homeland Security and US Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
ACLU Foundation of Texas, Inc. v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2020cv00397
Plaintiff:
ACLU Foundation of Texas, Inc.
Defendant:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and US Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01410
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Flores Valle et al v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2019cv02254
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, Simona Flores, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
ELL, Oludayo Oluwapelumi Okunowo, Luis Alberto Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manogna v. CPS et al
as 3:2019cv01743
Defendant:
Labanon Ridge Apartments, Hospitals, Kris Kat Seanes and others
Plaintiff:
Devabhaktuni Manogna and Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
