Cases 61 - 70 of 640
Shaffer v. Chubb Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Chubb Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Eileen N. Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Khoury v. Thota et al
as 4:2019cv04806
Defendant:
ROES, M.D. Archana Thota, Willowbrook Med Properties, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
M.D. Nabil T Khoury
Rosella v. CRC Insurance Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00875
Plaintiff:
Pamela Rosella
Defendant:
Sam Gardner, John Does 1 through 10, Branch Bank and Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stross v. Advantage Austin Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01108
Defendant:
Advantage Austin Properties, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hirsch v. Owen et al
as 1:2019cv01037
Defendant:
DOUGLAS WILLIAM OWEN, OWEN MEDIA GROUP LLC, Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HIRSCH
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dixon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04037
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and Bard Access Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Monica Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
2 Dogs Distribution, LLC v. Jacent Strategic Merchandising, LLC
as 2:2019cv00330
Defendant:
Jacent Strategic Merchandising, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
2 Dogs Distribution, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Azlin v. Azlin Planting Co. et al
as 4:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Kinlock Farms, LLC, Azlin Planting Co., Huntland Farms, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Hunter Azlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Noriega v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03549
Plaintiff:
Alex Noriega
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Bowers v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03544
Defendant:
BackChina, LLC. and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
