Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Wardle v. Hughley Hospital et al
as 3:2007cv01914
Plaintiff:
Randal Wardle
Defendant:
Hughley Hospital, U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Terrell State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Bush, et al
as 07-51224
Petitioner - Appellant:
TONY ROBERT DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE W BUSH, In His Official Capacity as the President of the United States, MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, In His Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Murphy v. Bush
as 5:2007cv01515
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murphy
Defendant:
George W Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Dell v. Wesco Aviation et al
as 4:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
Danny O'Dell
Defendant:
Wesco Aviation, Hosni Mubarak, George Clooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv00688
Petitioner:
Tony Robert Davis
Respondent:
George W. Bush, Alberto R. Gonzalez, The Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haley v. Bush et al
as 5:2007cv00975
Plaintiff:
John Benjamin Haley
Defendant:
George W Bush, Dick Cheney and Condolezza Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. Bush et al
as 5:2007mc00022
Plaintiff:
Vincent A Simmons
Defendant:
George W Bush, Kathleen Babineaux Blanco, 12th Judicial District Court and others
Larson v. Staples et al
as 6:2007cv00205
Plaintiff:
Justin Larson
Defendant:
Janice Staples, Cloey Chancey, George W Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grandinetti v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2007cv00200
Petitioner:
Francis A. Grandinetti, II
Respondent:
State of Texas, Governors in Charge, George W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
