Cases 61 - 70 of 1,920
Watson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Kelcey Watson
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson et al v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Phillip Watson and Lakeisha Watson
Defendant:
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., Christopher K. Pitcock and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Watson v. Enbridge (U.S.) Inc
as 4:2023cv01296
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Watson
Defendant:
Enbridge (U.S.) Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Watson v. Cook et al
as 4:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
Mack Watson, Jr
Defendant:
Randall S. Cook and Angela Chervalier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Dr. Julye et al
as 9:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
M.C. Metcalf
Defendant:
Dr. Julye, Dr. Montgomery, Unknown Female Officer Rover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Watson v. Fiesta Mart
as 23-20081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth Watson, also known as Elizabeth Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Fiesta Mart, L.L.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
