Cases 71 - 80 of 9,643
Edwin Jones v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC
as 4:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Edwin Neil Jones
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Defendant:
Edwin Neil Jones and 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guillot v. Wade
as 24-30247
Plaintiff:
Dylan Guillot
Defendant:
Warden Wade, Asst Warden Dear, Deputy Warden Cupp and others
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones et al v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, et al
as 4:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Trisha Jones and Shawn Jones
Defendant:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, d/b/a Christiana Trust, Not Individually but as Trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust, Selene Finance LP and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB As trustee for Pretium Mortgage Acquisition Trust doing business as Christiana Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Turner v. Houston Police Department
as 4:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Keisha Marie Turner
Defendant:
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and Tony Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Jones
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laracheal Jones
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Davis v. Pilot Company et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
Pilot Company, Hinds County Sheriff Department, Adam L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
