Cases 81 - 90 of 130
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , All Plaintiffs , Tawanda Jackson and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaddy v. Topps et al
as 2:2011cv03136
Plaintiff:
Scarlett M Gaddy
Defendant:
Demille Topps, Robert J. Crowe and Unidentified Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2011cv00601
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Gaddis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaddis v. Board of Pardon and Paroles
as 6:2011cv00545
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Gaddis, Jr
Defendant:
Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Thaler et al
as 5:2011cv00175
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Martinez
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Dawn Grounds, Justin D Bruner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Gaddis et al
as 2:2011cv00178
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bobbie M. Gaddis, Nell Magee and Carroll Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. Thaler et al
as 5:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lorione Smith
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, D Grounds, F Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. Cain
as 2:2011cv01665
Plaintiff:
Michael Gaddis
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaddis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2011cv00328
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Gaddis, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaddis v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 1:2011cv00329
Petitioner:
Eddie Lee Gaddis, Jr
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.