Cases 81 - 90 of 119
Marsh v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv00830
Petitioner:
Robert Marsh
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Bickham, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Texas, et al v. USA, et al
as 15-40333
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Movant - Appellant:
JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and JANE DOE #3
Kelley v. Livingston et al
as 6:2014cv00849
Plaintiff:
William Steed Kelley
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Regional Director Regjon II TDCJ-ID, John Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaVan Yankton, Sr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 14-60515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVAN YANKTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, EMMITT SPARKMAN, EARNEST LEE and others
Segrera-Delaespriella v. USA et al
as 2:2014cv02220
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Enrique Segrera-Delaespriella
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Chuck Maiorana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade Jackson v. Jason Collins, et al
as 14-30554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE P. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. JASON COLLINS, DR. JONATHAN ROUNDTREE, DR. UNKNOWN BARKMEYER and others
Sanchez v. United States et al
as 2:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sanchez
Defendant:
United States , Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Yankton v. Epps et al
as 4:2014cv00034
Plaintiff:
LaVan Yankton, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Richard Jennings v. Monty Hudspeth, et al
as 14-40021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD W. JENNINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTY HUDSPETH, Unit Warden, JOHN #2 DOE, Shift Sergeant, JANE DOE, I, Female TDCJ Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
