Cases 81 - 90 of 119
Pope et al v. Premier Mortgage Funding Inc
as 4:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Pope and Tasha Pope
Defendant:
Premier Mortgage Funding Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Straughn et al
as 5:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Harris
Defendant:
Clayton Straughn and John McCraw, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00153
Plaintiff:
Elaine V. Cantrell , Michael Ray Vaughn and Edward Vaughn, Jr.
Defendant:
AGCO Corporation , American Standard, Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Michael Harrison
as 11-40676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY HARRISON
Cook et al v. A.W. Chesterton et al
as 3:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Cook and Annette Cook
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Able Supply Company , Allis-Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Solis v. WIN Association LLC, et al
as 4:2011cv00616
Defendant:
WIN Association LLC, The WIN Association Health Plan and Michael Ray Bianchi
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
USA v. Michael Davi
as 10-11178
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY DAVIS
Martin v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 1:2010cv00538
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Martin
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Chapman et al v. Insureco Agency and Insurance Company et al
as 2:2010cv00547
Defendant:
Insureco Agency and Insurance Company, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Chapman , Edwin Achane , Brian Keith Alfred and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
